http://biztalkmessages.vansplunteren.net/2008/06/13/call-rules-shape-atomic-transactions-and-the-orchestration-designer/ Randal van Splunteren's experiences with BizTalk Server and other MS technologies. Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:47:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://biztalkmessages.vansplunteren.net/2008/06/13/call-rules-shape-atomic-transactions-and-the-orchestration-designer/#comment-964 Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:53:06 +0000 http://biztalkmessages.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-964 [...] Now why where we interested in this? We wanted to call the Business Rules Engine  several times in a low latency scenario and everyone thought that it would this might create a persistence point each time the rules where called. I was quite pleased with my result but I had a vague memory that back in BizTalk 2004 you needed to enclose the Call rules shape in an atomic transaction. A quick search showed me that in BizTalk 2006 this requirement was dropped. http://biztalkmessages.vansplunteren.net/2008/06/13/call-rules-shape-atomic-transactions-and-the-orc... [...]

]]> http://biztalkmessages.vansplunteren.net/2008/06/13/call-rules-shape-atomic-transactions-and-the-orchestration-designer/#comment-711 Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:44:27 +0000 http://biztalkmessages.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-711 [...] http://biztalkmessages.vansplunteren.net/2008/06/13/call-rules-shape-atomic-transactions-and-the-orc... [...]

]]> http://biztalkmessages.vansplunteren.net/2008/06/13/call-rules-shape-atomic-transactions-and-the-orchestration-designer/#comment-454 Sun, 27 Jun 2010 19:11:14 +0000 http://biztalkmessages.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-454 Yeah… this is a known issue. It has been reported during the TAP for BTS2010 (ID: 555872) and unfortunately, they have decided to not fix this for BTS2010

]]>